December 2009

Aleksandr Krutov v Russia, 3 December 2009
A violation of Article 10 of the Convention.
 
Denis Vasilyev v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the authorities’ failure to conduct an effective investigation into the assault on the applicant; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the police’s failure to render assistance to the applicant; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the authorities’ failure to conduct an effective investigation into the actions of the police; a violation of Article 13 of the Convention; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the inadequacy of the medical care dispensed to the applicant at Hospital no. 33; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the authorities’ failure to conduct an effective investigation into the alleged medical negligence.
 
Dzhurayev v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention; a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Golubeva v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 2 of the Convention under its substantive limb.
 
Kolchinayev v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Kraynova and Kraynov and 9 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
 
Kunashko v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 
 
Makarenko v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention; a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention on account of the delays in examining the lawfulness of the applicant's detention after 29 December 2003 and the failure to consider the substance of the applicant's appeal against the decision of 8 October 2003 and his request for release lodged on 24 November 2003.
 
Ryabov and 151 other “Privileged pensioners” cases v. Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
 
Shilbergs v Russia, 17 December 2009
A violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in the Neman town detention facility; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in detention facility no. IZ-39/1 in Kaliningrad; a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the three sets of civil proceedings on account of the domestic courts’ failure to secure the applicant’s attendance or to ensure the effective representation of his interests; a violation of Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in respect of the criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of the lack of legal aid at the appeal stage.
 
Volnykh v Russia, 17 December 2009
By six votes to one, no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention.
 
Bezymyannaya v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Butusov v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention on account of the examination of the applicant's appeal against the detention order of 23 July 2003 in the absence of the applicant and his counsel; a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention on account of the delay in examination of the applicant's appeal against the detention order of 23 July 2003.
 
Gorovaya v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Gudkov v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the quashing on 26 December 2002 via supervisory review of the final judgment in the applicant's favour.
 
Ignatyeva v Russia, 22 December 2009
In a judgment of 3 April 2008, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) in this case concerning the quashing of final judgments in the applicant’s favour by way of supervisory review, and that the question of the application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision. In this judgment of 22 December, the Court awarded the applicant EUR 3,500 (pecuniary damage) and EUR 3,000 (non-pecuniary damage).
 
Lekhanova v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
MP Kineskop v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Sergey Smirnov v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Skorobogatykh v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant's detention from 5 May to 30 December 1998 at remand prison no. IZ-39/1 in Kaliningrad; a violation of Article 13 of the Convention; a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
 
Talysheva v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final judgments in the applicant's favour.
 
Tatyana Makarova v Russia, 22 December 2009
A violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Comments