February 2010

Abdullayev v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final appeal judgment in the applicant’s favour.
 
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Islam Dubayev and Roman Bersnukayev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Islam Dubayev and Roman Bersnukayev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Islam Dubayev and Roman Bersnukayev; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the alleged violations of Article 2.
 
Fedchenko v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 10.
 
Fedchenko v Russia, No 2, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 10.
 
Guluyeva v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 2 in respect of Mr Ramzan Guluyev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Mr Ramzan Guluyev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants on account of the ill-treatment they had been subjected to in the course of Mr Ramzan Guluyev’s abduction; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the ill-treatment of the applicants; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants on account of their mental suffering; a violation of Article 5 of the Convention in respect of Mr Ramzan Guluyev; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the alleged violations of Article 2 and of Article 3 on account of the ill-treatment of the applicants.
 
Kayankin v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 § 1.
 
A violation of Article 6 on account of the quashing of the judgments in the applicants’ favour via supervisory review.
 
Malysh and Others v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
 
Sabirov v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the applicant’s detention from 9 October to 5 November 2003 and from 5 November to 5 December 2003; a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) on account of state-appointed counsel’s failure to appear before the cassation court.
 
Salakhutdinov V Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention from 9 January to 20 August 2002 Bugulma IZ-16/3 remand centre; a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention from 20 August 2002 to 26 August 2003 in Chistopol UE-148/T prison.
 
Votintseva v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 in respect of the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final judgments in the applicant’s favour.
 
A violation of Article 8 of the Convention.
 
Zalevskaya v Russia, 11 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final appeal judgment in the applicant’s favour.
 
Abbasov v Russia, 18 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No.1.
 
A violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the issue of the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to remain silent.
 
Aliyeva v Russia, 18 February 2010
A violation of Article 2 in respect of Mr Abu Aliyev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Mr Abu Aliyev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of Mr Abu Aliyev on account of the ill-treatment to which he had been subjected; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the ill-treatment of Mr Abu Aliyev; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicant on account of her mental suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Mr Abu Aliyev; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the alleged violations of Article 2 and Article 3 on account of the ill-treatment of Mr Abu Aliyev.
 
Anatoliy Tarasov v Russia, 18 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the unfairness of the supervisory review proceedings; a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the censorship of the Court’s letter.
 
Gribanenkov v Russia, 18 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in respect of non-enforcement of the judgments of 28 November 2003 as upheld on 14 January 2004, and of 6 December 2004; a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the length of the proceedings which ended with the judgment of 28 November 2003 as upheld on 14 January 2004; a violation of Article 13 on account of lack of an effective remedy against the excessive length of civil proceedings.
 
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Zurab Iriskhanov; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Zurab Iriskhanov disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Zurab Iriskhanov; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 2.
 
Nikolay Zaytsev v Russia, 18 February 2010
A violation of Article 6.
 
Sychev v Russia, 23 February 2010
A violation of Article 5 § 3 on account of the length of the applicant’s detention on remand.
 
Mordachev v Russia, 25 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 in respect of the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final appeal judgment in the applicant’s favour.
 
Korovina v Russia, 25 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 on account of the quashing of the final judgment of 21 April 2003, as amended by the appeal judgment of 2 June 2003, via supervisory review.
 
Kazyulin v Russia, 25 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 § 1 in respect of the unreasonable length of criminal proceedings against the applicant; a violation of Article 13 on account of absence of an effective remedy against the unreasonable length of criminal proceedings.
 
Kupriny v Russia, 25 February 2010
A violation of Article 6 in respect of the unreasonable length of the civil proceedings which ended on 15 December 2005; a violation of Article 13 on account of absence of an effective remedy against the unreasonable length of civil proceedings.
Comments