November 2011

Aleksandra Dmitriyeva v Russia, 3 November 2011
A violation of the substantive aspect of Article 3 on account of the way in which the applicant was arrested and brought to the police car on 8 December 2001; a violation of the procedural aspect of Article 3 on account of the authorities’ failure to investigate properly the circumstances of the applicant’s arrest and ill-treatment; a violation of Article 3 on account of the applicant’s conditions of detention on 8 and 9 December 2001; a violation of Article 5 on account of the applicant’s arbitrary arrest and detention on 8 and 9 December 2001; a violation of Article 8 on account of the unlawful entry by the policemen to the applicant’s apartment on 8 December 2001; a violation of Article 13 taken in conjunction with Articles 5 and 8.

Vanfuli v Russia, 3 November 2011
A violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb; no violation of Article 3 under its substantive limb; a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) taken in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 of on account of the absence of a lawyer while the applicant was in police custody; a violation of Article 6 § 3 (d) taken together with Article 6 § 1 on account of the fact that his conviction was to a decisive event based on evidence he could not challenge.

Filatov v Russia, 8 November 2011
A violation of Article 3 under its substantive and procedural limbs on account of the applicant’s ill-treatment on 28 and 29 November 2002.

Sambiyeva v Russia, 8 November 2011
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Said-Emin Sambiyev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Said-Emin Sambiyev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicant; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Said-Emin Sambiyev; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 2.

Yakubov v Russia, 8 November 2011
Holds that, if the order to expel the applicant to Uzbekistan were to be enforced, there would be a violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 13; decides to continue to indicate to the Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that it is desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings not to expel the applicant until such time as the present judgment becomes final or further order.

Ivantoc and Others v Moldova and Russia, 15 November 2011
A violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions in which Mr Ivanţoc and Mr Tudor Popa were detained until their release; a violation of Article 5 and a violation of Article 13 on account of the detention of Mr Ivanţoc and Mr Popa and of their lack of an effective remedy related thereto; a violation of Article 8 as regards the applicants Eudochia Ivanţoc and Victor Petrov’s right to respect for their private and family life, and correspondence.

Krasnov v Russia, 22 November 2011
A violation of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicant’s favour.
ĉ
Rights in Russia,
5 Jan 2012, 14:05
Comments