April

Akmadova v Russia, 3 April 2012
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Khozh-Akhmed Akhmadov; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the killing of Khozh-Akhmed Akhmadov; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 2.

Kazantsev v Russia, 3 April 2012
A violation of Article 3 under its substantive aspect; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural aspect.

Kotov v Russia, 3 April 2012
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Mukharev v Russia, 3 April 2012
A violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 5 § 4.

Andreyeva v Russia, 10 April 2012
A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

Kochalidze v Russia, 10 April 2012
A violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Pellya v Russia, 10 April 2012
A violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of delayed enforcement of the judgment of 19 September 2005.

Russkikh v Russia, 10 April 2012
A violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of non-enforcement.

Shchebetov v Russia, 10 April 2012
No violation of Article 2 on account of the applicant’s contraction of the HIV virus in detention; no violation of Article 2 on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out a thorough and expeditious investigation into the applicant’s complaint concerning his infection with HIV; the respondent State has not failed to comply with its obligations under Article 34.

Janowiec and Others v Russia, 16 April 2012
The respondent State failed to comply with their obligations under Article 38 of the Convention; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants Mr Gustaw Erchard, Ms Irena Erchard, Mr Janowiec, Mr Jerzy Karol Malewicz, the late Mr Krzysztof Jan Malewicz, Ms Mieszczankowska, Ms Michalska, Mr Tomaszewski, Mr Wielebnowski, and Ms Wołk.

Ilyushkin and Others v Russia, 17 April 2012
A violation of Article 13 because of the absence of effective remedies regarding the failure to execute judgments made in favour of twenty-nine applicants whose applications were declared admissible and, consequently, the Court dismisses the plea of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies made by the Government; a violation of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because of the long-term failure to execute judgments ordering the authorities to provide housing for twenty-nine applicants whose applications were declared admissible.

Kalinkin and Others v Russia, 17 April 2012
A violation of Article 13 because of the absence of effective domestic remedies in relation to the failure to execute judgments in favour of the applicants and, consequently, the Court dismisses the plea of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies put forward by the Government; a violation of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because of the long-term failure to execute judgments ordering the authorities to provide housing for the applicants.

Chumakov v Russia, 24 April 2012
A violation of Article 3 in its procedural aspect; a violation of Article 5 § 1 (c) on account of the applicant’s detention on remand from 3 August to 1 September 2004; a violation of Article 5 § 3.

Damir Sibgatullin v Russia, 24 April 2012
A violation of Article 6 § 1 taken together with Article 6 § 3 (d) on account of the absence of a proper and adequate opportunity to challenge the statements by the prosecution witnesses; a violation of Article 38.

Gennadiy Medvedev v Russia, 24 April 2012
A no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention.

Solovyevy v Russia, 24 April 2012

A violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8.

ĉ
Rights in Russia,
4 Jun 2012, 03:51
Comments