December 2012

MITYAGINY v. RUSSIA, 4 December 2012
A violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb. 

SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2012
A violation of Article 3 on account of the applicants’ placement in a metal cage in the courtroom; a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicants. 

TANGIYEV v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2012
A violation of Article 3 under its substantive limb on account of the applicant’s allegations of ill‑treatment in custody; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out an effective investigation into the applicant’s allegations of ill‑treatment in custody; a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant. 

ASLAKHANOVA v. RUSSIA, 18 December 2012 
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of the applicants’ eight relatives: Apti Avtayev, Sulumbek Barshov, Anzor Barshov, Abuyazid Shidayev, Ayub Temersultanov (also known as Ruslan Tupiyev), Ayub Nalbiyev, Badrudin Abazov and Ramzan Tepsayev; a procedural violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to investigate effectively the disappearance of the applicants’ eight relatives; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants, on account of their relatives’ disappearance and the authorities’ response to their suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of the applicants’ disappeared relatives; a violation of Article 3 in respect of Akhmed Shidayev, on account of inhuman and degrading treatment inflicted upon him between 25 and 30 October 2002 and the failure to effectively investigate this allegation; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Akhmed Shidayev, on account of his illegal detention between 25 and 30 October 2002; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3. 

SOPIN v. RUSSIA, 18 December 2012
No violation of Article 5 § 3.
Comments