Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: May 2013

PETUKHOVA v. RUSSIA
, 2 May 2013 
A violation of Article 5 § 1 (b).

SAMARTSEV v. RUSSIA, 2 May 2013 
A violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out an effective and thorough investigation into the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment on 4-5 May 2005; a violation of Article 3 under its substantive limb on account of the applicant’s allegations of ill‑treatment on 28-29 June 2005; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out an effective and thorough investigation into the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment on 28-29 June 2005; a violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention between 3 May 2005 and 27 February 2006 in the temporary detention ward of the Department of the Interior of the town of Naberezhnye Chelny in the Republic of Tatarstan. 

ZAGIDULINA v. RUSSIA, 2 May 2013 
A violation of Article 5 § 1. 

E.A. v. RUSSIA, 23 May 2013 
A violation of Article 3. 

K. v. RUSSIA, 23 May 2013 
A violation of Article 5 § 4. 

DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA, 30 May 2013 
A violation of Article 3 under its substantive aspect; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural aspect. 

MALOFEYEVA v. RUSSIA, 30 May 2013 
A violation of Article 5 § 2; a violation of Article 5 § 4; a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 on account of the lack of a public hearing and in relation to the applicant’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against her, and the right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of her defence; a violation of Article 11, assessed in the light of its Article 10. 

OOO 'VESTI' AND UKHOV v. RUSSIA, 30 May 2013 
No violation of Article 10; no violation of Article 6 § 1 as regards the alleged partiality of the courts; no violation of Article 6 § 1 as regards the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms. 
Comments