Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: December 2014

ALEKSANDR VALERYEVICH KAZAKOV v. RUSSIA
, 4 December 2014
A violation Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) on account of the trial court’s reliance on statements by the prosecution witness M. whom the applicant had no opportunity to question.

KRIKUNOV v. RUSSIA, 4 December 2014
A violation of Article 5 § 3.

NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. RUSSIA, 4 December 2014
A violation of Article 11; a violation of Article 6 § 1; a violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3; a violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of detention.

BIRYUCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2014
A violation of Article 5 § 1 in all cases; a violation of Article 5 § 3 in the Biryuchenko and Oynas cases; a violation of Article 5 § 4 in the Biryuchenko and Oynas cases; a violation of Article 6 § 2 in respect of Mr Leontyev and Mr Ponomarev in the Stepanov and Others case.

FOZIL NAZAROV v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2014
Holds that the forced return of the applicant to Uzbekistan would give rise to a violation of Article 3; Decides to continue to indicate to the Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that it is desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings not to expel or otherwise involuntarily remove the applicant from Russia to Uzbekistan or another country until such time as the present judgment becomes final or until further order.

HROMADKA AND HROMADKOVA v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2014
A violation of Article 8.

KHISMATULLIN v. RUSSIA, 11 December 2014
A violation of Article 3 under its procedural aspect.

BELENKO v. RUSSIA, 18 December 2014
A violation of Article 2 under its procedural limb.
Comments