 The Court decides to revise its judgment of 15 January 2015 insofar as it concerns the claims made under Article 41 of the Convention in application no. 68860/10; holds that it makes no difference to the order to pay EUR 60,000 that one of the applicants has died and that the total amount of EUR 60,000 should be paid to the two remaining applicants, Ms Kisa Dzhabrailova and Mr Adlan Dzhabrailov and Article 41 of the Court’s judgment of 15 January 2015 revised accordingly pursuant to Rule 80 of the Rules of Court; furthermore, that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points. CASE OF KHACHUKAYEVY v. RUSSIA, 9 February 2016 A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Mr Islam Deniyev; a procedural violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to investigate the abduction and death of Mr Islam Deniyev; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the mental suffering caused to the first and second applicants; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Mr Islam Deniyev on account of his unlawful detention; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3. CASE OF NAZYROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 9 February 2016 A violation of Article 2 in respect of the applicants’ relatives Mr Badrudi Nazyrov, Mr Muma Babuyev, Mr Ruslan Kagermanov, Mr Eduard Zaynadinov and Mr Ayndi Diniyev; a procedural violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to investigate the disappearance of the applicants’ relatives; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants, on account of their relatives’ disappearance and the authorities’ response to their suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of the applicants’ relatives on account of their unlawful detention; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3. CASE OF SHLYCHKOV v. RUSSIA, 9 February 2016 A violation of Article 3 under its substantive limb; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb; a violation of Article 6 § 1 in respect of the use of the applicant’s surrender and confession statement as evidence. CASE OF ZINOVCHIK v. RUSSIA, 9 February 2016 A violation of Article 3 under its substantive limb in respect of the incident of 8 April 2004; a violation of Article 3 under its procedural limb. CASE OF DALAKOV v. RUSSIA, 16 February 2016 A violation of Article 2 under its procedural head; a violation of Article 2 under its substantive head. CASE OF YEVDOKIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 16 February 2016 A violation of Article 6 § 1. CASE OF ALEKSANDR ANDREYEV v. RUSSIA, 23 February 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 1 (c); a violation of Article 3 under its substantive and procedural limbs. CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA, 23 February 2016 A violation of Article 3 by the Russian Federation; a violation of Article 5 § 1 by the Russian Federation; a violation of Article 8 by the Russian Federation; a violation of Article 9 by the Russian Federation; a violation by the Russian Federation of Article 13 taken in conjunction with Articles 3, 8 and 9. CASE OF NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV v. RUSSIA, 23 February 2016 A violation of Article 6 § 1. CASE OF Y.Y. v. RUSSIA, 23 February 2016 A violation of Article 8. |
|
|