 The respondent State has failed to comply with the interim measure indicated by the Court under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, in violation of its obligation under Article 34; a violation of Article 3. CASE OF GORBUNOV AND GORBACHEV v. RUSSIA, 1 March 2016 A violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c). CASE OF KHOLMURODOV v. RUSSIA, 1 March 2016 A violation of Article 3 with regard to enforcement of the measure to remove the applicant to Uzbekistan; a violation of Article 13 combined with Article 3; a violation of Article 5 § 1. CASE OF NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 15 March 2016 A violation of Article 14, read together with Article 8. CASE OF VIDISH v. RUSSIA, 15 March 2016 A violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in the LIU OF‑73/3 medical facility; a violation of Article 8 on account of the unlawful restrictions on family visits; a violation of Article 8 on account of the monitoring of the Court’s correspondence with the applicant. CASE OF BUTRIN v. RUSSIA, 22 March 2016 A violation of Article 13 on account of the absence of an effective domestic remedy to complain of inadequate conditions of detention; a violation of Article 3 on account of the inhuman and degrading conditions of the applicant’s detention. CASE OF KOLESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA, 22 March 2016 A violation of Article 13; a violation of Article 3. CASE OF LITVINOV v. RUSSIA, 22 March 2016 A violation of Article 13. CASE OF BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA, 23 March 2016 A violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d). CASE OF ZHEREBIN v. RUSSIA, 24 March 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 3. CASE OF KOCHEROV AND SERGEYEVA v. RUSSIA, 29 March 2016 A violation of Article 8. |
|
|