 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the complaint under Article 5 § 4 raised under well-established case-law of the Court in application no. 29899/09. CASE OF POTEKHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 3 November 2016 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). CASE OF SARKISYAN v. RUSSIA, 3 November 2016 A breach of Article 5 § 4 concerning the excessive length of judicial review of detention. CASE OF ADAYEV v. RUSSIA, 8 November 2016 A violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d). CASE OF DZHAVADOV v. RUSSIA, 8 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 3. CASE OF USTINOVA v. RUSSIA, 8 November 2016 A violation of Article 8. CASE OF YABLOKO RUSSIAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 8 November 2016 A violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in respect of the first and the third applicants. CASE OF ZADONSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 8 November 2016 A violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the applicant Mr Mironov. CASE OF FEDORIN v. RUSSIA, 15 November 2016 A violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 5 § 4; a violation of Article 6 § 1. CASE OF GORBATENKO AND SHEYDYAKOV v. RUSSIA, 15 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 5 § 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4. CASE OF GORYACHKIN v. RUSSIA, 15 November 2016 A violation of Article 6 § 1. CASE OF ZOLOTAREV v. RUSSIA, 15 November 2016 A violation of Article 3 in its substantive aspect; a violation of Article 3 in its procedural aspect; a violation of Article 34. CASE OF ALENTSEVA v. RUSSIA, 17 November 2016 A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. CASE OF PCHELINTSEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 17 November 2016 A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. CASE OF PONYAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 17 November 2016 A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. CASE OF ANTSIFEROV AND NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the failure to examine speedily the applicants’ appeals against the detention orders of 19 April 2006, 14 July 2006 and 2 September 2009. CASE OF ARTEMENKO v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 6. CASE OF BELOVA v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the quashing by way of supervisory review proceedings of the judgment in the applicant’s favour. CASE OF DZHASYBAYEVA v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 3. CASE OF GREBNEVA AND ALISIMCHIK v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 10. CASE OF GVINIASHVILI v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the holding of appeal hearings on 19 January and 8 April 2009 in the absence of the applicant and his lawyer. CASE OF KISELEV v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 1. CASE OF KORNILOV v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 6 § 2. CASE OF KOSYANOV v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 5 § 1; a violation of Article 5 § 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4. CASE OF MARYASOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 6 § 1. CASE OF ORTSUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of the applicants’ relatives, Mr Islam Ortsuyev, Mr Adam Gachayev, Mr Aslan Israilov, Mr Anzor Israilov, Mr Ibragim Askhabov, Mr Shaip Makhmudov, Mr Sayd-Magomed Abubakarov, Mr Lechi Temirkhanov, Mr Apti Dedishov, Mr Abu Dedishov, Mr Adam Dedishov, Mr Suliman Magomadov, Mr Salambek Magomadov, Mr Vakha Ibragimov, Mr Abu Dudagov, Mr Adam Temersultanov and Mr Magomedrasul Magomedov; a procedural violation of Article 2 on account of the failure to investigate the killing of Mr Adam Temersultanov and the disappearance of Mr Islam Ortsuyev, Mr Adam Gachayev, Mr Aslan Israilov, Mr Anzor Israilov, Mr Ibragim Askhabov, Mr Shaip Makhmudov, Mr Sayd-Magomed Abubakarov, Mr Lechi Temirkhanov, Mr Apti Dedishov, Mr Abu Dedishov, Mr Adam Dedishov, Mr Suliman Magomadov, Mr Salambek Magomadov, Mr Vakha Ibragimov, Mr Abu Dudagov and Mr Magomedrasul Magomedov; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants, except for the fifth and thirty-fourth applicants, on account of their relatives’ disappearance and the authorities’ response to their suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of the applicants’ relatives on account of their unlawful detention; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 2 in respect of all of the applicants and of Article 3 in respect of the applicants whose complaints were declared admissible, except for the fifth and thirty-fourth applicants. CASE OF VASILYADI v. RUSSIA, 22 November 2016 A violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 5 § 3. CASE OF AFANASYEV v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A breach of Article 13. CASE OF ALEKSANDROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A breach of Article 13. CASE OF BORISENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 The applications disclose a breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). CASE OF CHERNYKH v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A breach of Article 13. CASE OF KOLEVATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 concerning the inadequate conditions of detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court. CASE OF KLEPIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). CASE OF KRAVETS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A breach of Article 5 § 4 concerning the lack of speedy review of the detention matters. CASE OF MAYEVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised in applications nos. 5403/07 and 12097/09 under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). CASE OF MUMZHIYEV v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A breach of Article 13. CASE OF SOLOVYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 The complaints disclose a breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). CASE OF TERENINA v. RUSSIA, 24 November 2016 A violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). |
|
|