Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: September 2016

CASE OF ANDREY MEDVEDEV v. RUSSIA, 13 September 2016
A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; a violation of Article 8.

CASE OF KIRILLOVA v. RUSSIA, 13 September 2016
A violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

CASE OF BOCHAROV v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 4.

CASE OF BURMAGA v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the applicant’s unlawful detention between 29 April and 31 May 2005; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the applicant’s absence from the detention hearing of 31 May 2005.

CASE OF CHERNOYVAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 3.

CASE OF KARELIN v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the impartiality requirement.

CASE OF KONDRULIN v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 34; a violation of Article 3.

CASE OF MAKHMUD v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the delay in the examination of the applicant’s appeals lodged against detention orders.

CASE OF SERGEY ZAYTSEV v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 6 on account of the conduct of the trial in the applicant’s case in camera.

CASE OF VERSHININ v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 1.

CASE OF VLASOV AND BENYASH v. RUSSIA, 20 September 2016
A violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4.

CASE OF GRABOVOY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 22 September 2016
A breach of Article 5 § 3 concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention.

CASE OF RUDENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 22 September 2016
A breach of Article 3 concerning the inadequate conditions of detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).

CASE OF USHAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 22 September 2016
A breach of Article 5 § 3 the excessive length of pre-trial detention; a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table).

CASE OF GONTMAKHER v. RUSSIA, 27 September 2016
A violation of Article 5 § 1 (c); a violation of Article 5 § 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the authorities’ failure to address the applicant’s argument concerning the lawfulness of his detention and on account of the lack of speedy review of the lawfulness of his detention.

CASE OF MIROSHNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, 27 September 2016
A violation of Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in all applications on account of the quashing of the final domestic judgments in the applicants’ favour by way of supervisory review.
Comments